![]() ![]() Search deals are a cancer and not just from Google. And that’s the least of how bad they are influenced, the list would take pages and would probably end removed from comments as a conspiracy theory. Maybe Google should pay the DoJ people more ?Ĭhrome is owned by Google, Firefox also in practice with the above mentioned search deal, Apple gets billions from Google from the search deal, even smaller browsers that are supposed to be more ethical almost all have a search deal that demonstrably influenced them negatively already against their users: DDG with their own engine (like Google with Chrome, they are a search engine before making a browser only to carry it by default for free), Waterfox with Microsoft Bing and Startpage, Pale Moon has some deal too, Brave is an ad platform that launched its own search engine too… Even the obscure linux fork will be corrupted to insert ad whitelistings for search engine sites. That’s the power of receiving about half a billion dollars yearly from Google. They don’t even stop a second to talk about privacy and censorship issues, in fact not really mentioning why it’s supposed to be so good. What is funny is that this Google dump that Mozilla is that pretends to be on the side of the users against whatever they consider has power, in addition to of course systematically betraying us to please Google or its own in-house ad and tracking people, talks in defense of Google every time even the Department of Justice (not the most progressive people one can think of, to say the least) tries to go after them for power abuse, by pretending that Google deserves to stick their search engine nose by force in every possible place because they are sooo much better than all other search engines in existence, according to Mozilla at least. I don’t like shorts (except in summer, hmm), I dislike the concept, fast-videos after fast-food, fast, faster … to bring what? Emptiness, IMOĭoes that answer your question, Çitak :) I don’ view YouTube videos on YouTube but via a Piped or a Piped-Material YouTube front-end instance and these offer on search results and on channels the option to view Videos-Shorts-Livestreams-Playlists-Channels well, I practically never open the ‘Shorts’ display. For those who dislike many scripts and dedicated browser extensions have been developed to handle them (removal or redirect to standard video display). YouTube Shorts may suit smartphones (which I don’t use) but on a PC they are not my cup of tea, to put it mildly.įrom what I read a bit everywhere, opinions are shared : love or hate. I’m commenting the article “Google is in trouble with YouTube Shorts – gHacks Tech News” by Emre ÇitakĪbout the article’s question, “What do you think about YouTube Shorts?” (BTW first time I read here any other writer other than Martin Brinkmann directly asks the audience it’s opinion, and that’s just fine) : ![]() Given Ghacks’ comments’ database problems I precise : In his interview, he said that the competition between companies like Google and Microsoft will hurt many people, making them lose their jobs, or AI might even bring the end of humanity. As you may remember, Hinton, also known as the godfather of AI, quit his job at Google to explain the possible dangers of AI. Google's plans and intentions were clearly stated at the event, and it looks like the competition that Geoffrey Hinton's hesitations will keep on getting bigger and bigger. Read Also: Google launches experimentation platform Search Labs The company made its point loud and clear at the event, using the word over 140 times. Microsoft is investing billions in the industry, and Google doesn't want to get behind in this race. Reporters at CNET said "Pichai and other presenters mentioned AI roughly 143 times over the two-hour presentation," which makes around 1.153 AI mentions per minute.Īccording to CNET, here are the other AI-related mentions at I/O 2023 event:Īrtificial intelligence will shape futureĪrtificial intelligence has become one of the hottest topics on the internet in no time, and a vast amount of people started using different tools to benefit from in their daily lives, whether it is for entertainment or work. Pichai dropped the first bullet, and almost every person who got up to deliver a speech said AI in some parts of their speeches. Sundar Pichai came to the stage to make the opening talk, and the madness started right there. Pretty sure Google is focusing on AI at this year’s I/O. It turned out that the company used the word "AI" over 140 times in its 2-hour keynote event. Reporters at CNET sat and counted how many times Google said AI throughout the event. After yesterday's Google I/O 2023 keynote event, a video of Google CEO Sundar Pichai saying the word "AI" over and over again was shared thousands of times, as seen below. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |